/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2280946

>Show me evidence of an external god altering reality.

No, that`s why it`s called a belief, a reasonable belief in my opinion.

Show me evidence we are actually experiencing another realitie so to speak

>>2280946

>Show me evidence of an external god altering reality.

No, that`s why it`s called a belief, a reasonable belief in my opinion.

Show me evidence you can actually experience other realities so to speak

>>2267842
By "inner self" i mean mind indeed but some people might argue it includes a soul as well or there is no need to dify such thing as a mind.

I used "inner self" to avoid this discussion.

The same reason i used "the world around you" in stead of reality.

by connection i mean how they relate to each other.

>>2254675
>>2254708
>>2254713

and it`s not Thilo Sarrazin`s book it`s way worse.

i know what josef means but i just can`t help myself generalizing.

anyway thnx for the reply`s

check out /sci/ same time tomorrow maybe i`ll post what continues.

>>2222430

People like you are mostly the one`s who don`t understand the theory(which is, according to a lot of prominent sceintists most likely to be reality).

Wiki
>the Schrödinger cat thought experiment remains a topical touchstone for all interpretations of quantum mechanics. How each interpretation deals with Schrödinger's cat is often used as a way of illustrating and comparing each interpretation's particular features, strengths, and weaknesses.
>Is the cat required to be an observer, or does its existence in a single well-defined classical state require another external observer?
>The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that after a while, the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when we look in the box, we see the cat either alive or dead, not both alive and dead.

That`s what the Copenhagen interpretation says and thats what is considered the most likely interpretation of QM by prominent sceintists all over the world.
It seems, there is some consciousness or immaterial element of an observer(human being/ other being) involved.
So stop being a pathatic fuck and accept the fact that some thing seem miraculous.

Reference to Wheeler's delayed choice experiment being successfully preformed...
>they claim that this experiment definitively rules out all interpretations of Quantum Mechanics, except the Copenhagen and the Bohm interpretation.
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=174876

>>2213198
>"interaction", is what fundementally defines observables in the universe

Not claiming i know much QM.

I`ll rather rely on what wiki says thoug. They don`t write things down as they do just because they though it would look funny.

>the experiment in 2007 showed that the act of observation ultimately decides whether the photon will behave as a particle or wave

If what you said would be the conclusion of that experiment i would have read

>the experiment in 2007 showed that interaction ultimately decides whether the photon will behave as a particle or wave

God = the supreme being, the light, the last truth.

Ghost = immaterial being

>>2188960

study with books, pen and paper and enough time or fail miserably.

>>2146697

You`re too dumb to take an adviced apparently, don`t make yourself bigger as you really are.

Believing appears to be the destiny of a human.
Why swim against the tie, and fallow a verry unlikely logic ?