/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15034461
If you cannot answer the questions of mass and what mechanisms act to produce what we observe as inertia and gravity, then you are simply making measurements without understanding. That was fine for an incel in the 17th century, but a total embarrassment for this so-called civilization in the 21st century.

>>15034461
>Before that answer me this, does knowing that is going to dramatically improve his understanding of things like Newtonian Mechanics?

Newtonian Mechanics cannot be understood without underlying factors.

If you cannot answer the questions of mass and what mechanisms act to product what we observe as inertia and gravity, then you are simply making measurements without understanding. That was fine for an incel in the 17th century, but a total embarrassment for this so-called civilization in the 21st century.

>>14642108
I knew something was missing when the thread was up for 26 hours with barely 350 posts.