/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15215091
>The more I think about it, it's the most plausible explanation for quantum entanglement
No, it is not, pic related is. The physical world is informational (VIRTUAL). All points are equadistant from the processor. IF spin up, THEN spin down. Super determinism is cope from minds immersed in a virtual reality who can't admit that the processing takes place OUTSIDE (non-locally) the virtual time and space.

>>15194863
>and no interpretation of QM can give a satisfactory explanation
Not true. The simulation theory, specifically the campbellian one, can explain it. See pic.
>Here, the simulation theory offers a very simple explanation for the violation of the principle of locality implied by Bell's no-go theorem, the EPR paradox Bell's inequalities violation experiments 1, 3] and quantum entanglement 22: notions of locality and distance defined within the simulation do not constrain the action space of the system performing the simulation (i.e. from the perspective of the system performing the simulation, changing the values of variables of spins/particles separated by 1 meter or 1 light year has the same complexity)

All points are equidistant from the processor, and so the 'distance' is virtual distance and not fundamental.

>>15137075
It means that causation comes from outside spacetime (this is key to understanding why brains in spacetime can't cause consciousness). There are faster than light correlations between spacelike separated data objects. This is possible because all points are equadistant from the processor, see pic. There's something called the no signalling though which says you can't send classical information though, this has to do with the refresh rate of our reality, also see pic
>In physics, the no-communication theorem or no-signaling principle is a no-go theorem from quantum information theory which states that, during measurement of an entangled quantum state, it is not possible for one observer, by making a measurement of a subsystem of the total state, to communicate information to another observer.

>>15128666
I will add that one needs to know that
>no theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of QM.
And so this is important for defeating claims about constraints on freewill with regard to materialist event causation coming from within spacetime (it comes from non-local computing by the way, see pic). This is important because brains are in space time. Brains can't cause anything. And connection between brain and mind is simulated and only ever correlated. This is what donald hofman is on about. One of the only intelligent cognitive scientists. And so these supposed constraints on freewill with regard to the goings on in the brain and universe in general with regard to matter and it's motion are not the decider of the matter. and so freewill awareness units and agent causation are input input devices and factors as well. And consciousness not 'in' the virtual spacetime. It has no momentum, position, spin etc physical quantifiables.