/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8582793
One again, the statistical abomination of gluing high frequency, high resolution data at the end of low frequency, low resolution data. Amazing how that creates a hockey stick.

Climate "Scientists" wouldn't last a day in statistics grad school. How about an honest proxy reconstruction? Pic related.

Source: http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/jhm/AGW/Loehle/Loehle_McC_E&E_2008.pdf

And he was vindicated by Ljungqvist, Fredrik Charpentier. "A new reconstruction of temperature variability in the extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere during the last two millennia." Geogr. Ann. A 92.3 (2010): 339-351.

>>8566709
>>>8566669
>>What happens if you consistently use the same data type (non-instrumental) and don't conveniently redate proxies (unlike Marcott)? You get pic related.
>Yeah but that never happened. He didn't consistently use the same type of data
>http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/past-reconstructions/

How convenient to run to a Paid Shill site and pretend that Loehle didn't issue a correction in 2008. But he did:
http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/jhm/AGW/Loehle/Loehle_McC_E&E_2008.pdf
Pic related.

And he was vindicated by Ljungqvist, Fredrik Charpentier. "A new reconstruction of temperature variability in the extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere during the last two millennia." Geogr. Ann. A 92.3 (2010): 339-351.

Better resort to ad hominem, real fast. "Hurr, durr, evil denier journals don't count."