/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11233366
Humans actually evolved from Lions.

1) DNA consumption is a driver of evolution. You are what you eat.
>Lions ate a lot of apes and other land mammals over the millions of years of evolution.
>Lions and humans were always apex predators and carnivores first.

2) DNA follows form, form follows function:
> We run; we don't swing
> Homologous structures do not imply a causative, evolutionary sequence
> Bipedal convergence yields DNA convergence (i.e. similar structures are coded for similarly)

3) Follow the hormones (sexual dimorphism)

---------------------------------------------------

More details:

1) The function of survival by catching prey is the primary factor we’re discussing here.

2) The form of bipedal endurance running evolved because it’s more energy efficient, provides better sight lines for communication, and allows the use of hand-held weapons and tools to catch prey, among other advantages.

3) DNA is efficient and codes for the form (bipedalism) required to carry out the primary function (survival).

Function (survival, food) informs Form (bipedalism); Form informs Code.

It’s rather opposite the paradigm established in computer software coding platforms, but we can save that one for another discussion.

We domesticated ourselves - monogamy was a big factor.

Here's a thread full of Egyptian redpills:
>>>/x/23940821

>>11230741
The reason there's a distinction between the demiurgic physical and higher spiritual planes is because the universe needs a great filter, a great test of mettle.

Is gnosticism a manifestation of one's dismay of being born into a hellscape of other people's love?

Can the ignorant/malevolent characterization of the demiurge be derived from the unsettled, unloving nature of one's own parents? Why did they craft this physical existence for you if they did not love themselves?

Does this disequilibrium explain the perverse, endless, scientific searching of the void for meaning?

It was right in front of one's face the whole time: family.