[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.12730828 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, wrong skybox layer.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12730828

>>12730780
>when one of the many Shaders that make up your Earth model has a math error and stops rendering (goes transparent) and you can see what's behind the Earth
I code Shaders btw. This is obviously CGI.

>> No.12730749 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, wrong skybox layer.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12730749

Explain this.

It appears NASA assigned the skybox to the wrong layer in their 3D modeling program.

>> No.11995569 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995569

>>11995454
>but I am quite certain they are in space.

why lie though?

>> No.11513243 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11513243

>>11510576
>where are the stars?

>> No.11374160 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11374160

forgotlayer.webm

>> No.11308169 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11308169

here's "real" nasa footage where they accidentally put their cgi star layer over the earth instead of behind it! oops!

>> No.11300261 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11300261

>>11299744
>Explain how you can tell. Show the evidence.

>> No.11224579 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11224579

>>11224578
>Why fake this AT ALL????
>ESA (Europeon NASA) fucked up their CGI, see 15:10
>https://youtu.be/HpBEduGMapw?t=908

>> No.10669411 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, live feed glitch.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10669411

>>10669307
It's important because people think that these are full PHOTOGRAPHS of the earth, but they are actually CGI, IMAGES stitched together by using photos from high- altitude planes. It's like if I sold you a new BMW, but really I just stitched together 10 different cars.

It's like this Live feed glitch from the ISS. If it was real video footage, there wouldn't be a CGI glitch with the stars overlaying the planet

>> No.9737022 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9737022

Why fake this AT ALL????

ESA (Europeon NASA) fucked up their CGI, see 15:10

https://youtu.be/HpBEduGMapw?t=908

>> No.9653396 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9653396

ESA (Europeon NASA) fucked up their CGI, see 15:10

https://youtu.be/HpBEduGMapw?t=908

>> No.9188113 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, eesacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9188113

>>9187885
Nasa and EESA make BILLIONS every year, yet theres no real pictures of earth. Beyond cgi/fisheye lens, which futher casts doubt.

Why not just take raw footage of the earth NATURALLY??? We cant take pictures of other planets, right???

Why fake this AT ALL????

EESA (Europeon NASA) fucked up their CGI, see 15:10

https://youtu.be/HpBEduGMapw?t=908

>> No.9188110 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, eesacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9188110

>>9187213

THIS

>> No.8985873 [View]
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, eesacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8985873

>>8977933

This guy does a good video talking about earth spin fallacy

https://youtu.be/vbHI8ezKgjE

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]