/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15234305
>what is vacuum energy?

>>11612107
>humans aren't made of atoms

>being part of ST
>not EM
oh, honey

>>11186522
>he unironically thinks that superintelligent AI is perfectly safe

>>11170753
>>11170840
>>11171154
>>11171610

irrelevant and brainlet tier responses. No where does it state the rate at which females croak or the length of time listened. If females only croak once per lifetime than the chance that the non croaking frog is more likely to be male is infinitesimal. Same with the length of time listening. Inferring whatever you want to make yourself correct is next level retarded. It also says to find the chance of survival >50% is not a chance. It is a range and your a brainlet. kys.

>>10845808
>can't use reverse image search\
>can't google at all
>you won't post everything I demand therefore it doesn't exist and you're wrong!

>>10650461
this post... kek

>>10552919
>doesn't know about periodontal disease

>>10391660
here you go

>>10313485
Ok this confirms you are actually mentally challenged, nowhere in the article is said they learn to dance, it's about specific neural activity in forager and dancer
>These findings demonstrate that the small-type Kenyon cell-preferential activity is associated with foraging behavior, suggesting its involvement in information integration during foraging flight, which is an essential basis for dance communication.
Where do you read or extrapolate "dancing is an acquired behaviour"?
Pic related is you thinking nest and hive building is acquired behaviour

>>10274678
>cryptography isn't math

>>10101169
>rectangle
If anything it would be an infinite sides polygon. But even that is debatable.

>>9968658
> He's a dumbass that doesn't know the difference between hox genes and homeobox genes

>physicist
>starts talking about literally anything but physics

>>9843559