/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8619314
>another Australian "climate researcher" was recently indicted for fraud
oh for fuck sake, he's not a climatologist; he's a biogeochemist. and his fraud had nothing to do with his actual research; he was cooking his expense report and pocketing the excess.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/11/scientist-on-great-barrier-reef-research-body-alleged-to-have-fabricated-expenses

your best argument against climatology is that a researcher in a different field overbilled his employer. let that sink in a moment. that is literally the best you're bringing?