/sci/ - Science & Math

Well how much mass does linear momentum weigh?
All of it?

>>3878099
The secret sauce of your question is this.

Religion = Philosophy
Magic = Science

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -- Arthur C. Clarke

"In the Ancient Orient, all religion was more or less a mystery and there was no divorce from it of philosophy. The popular theology, taking the multitude of allegories and symbols for realities, degenerated into a worship of the celestial luminaries, of imaginary Deities with human feelings, passions, appetites, and lusts, of idols, stones, animals, reptiles." -- Albert Pike, Fellowcraft via Morals and Dogma

Philosophy + Science = What you're after via your question. And this is ok! Also humanity needs myths and legends in order to survive the psychological onslaught of the sterile sanity most people force on others.

>>1219463

If, OTOH, the you had ontological-by-definition non-Mathetonium objects-- Literally unstoppable, immovable under ANY circumstances, presumably because a Gnostic extra-temporal God is pouring Kardashev-10 force behind every quanta in these objects-- which are made of Neutronium-- holding them in rigid formation...

* They would pass through one another. Just like yanking a Ragdoll Bush (http://www.mostfungames.com/bush-ragdoll.htm)) through overlapping circles-- ENOUGH force (like an ontologically unstoppable object must have) would override the binding forces which keep atoms apart. Or,
* The Unstoppable Object would begin to slow such that it would traverse 1/2 of the remaining D distance between it and the unmovable object for every unit of T time. Zeno's Paradox; the object does not stop, and the wall does not move. (You are again killed by a massive burst of gamma radiation as the object sheds inertia.)

(Of course this is a patently ridiculous question since you failed to answer; unmovable relative to what, or explain how you plan to get a turtle of infinite mass to stand still for that long.)