[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11801412 [View]
File: 241 KB, 1614x1034, Screen Shot 2020-06-15 at 10.17.21 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11801412

>>11801104
The only way to properly define infinity is in the context of a single linear fractional transformation on the Riemann sphere.
If we consider the canonical map f(z)=1/z, then we define infinity to be the image of f at 0, so as to make f biholomorphic on the Riemann sphere. Or in your words, u = 1/0. Similarly, u is just the preimage of 0 by f.
u is only well-defined in the domain of f and f-inverse, you can't just yolo "u*0", it's ill-defined.

The wikipedia article is quite good and got me through the start of a grad class on complex variables.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6bius_transformation

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]