/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10787800
-Wertheimer and Leeper was not discredited. That's simply false. Biophysical mechanisms had been proposed as early as 1965. With the publication of Bawin and Adey's calcium efflux papers, and later the implication of NO related processes, it was quite clear that not only was there an effect on organisms, there were mechanisms to explain it. In reality, you don't need to know how something happens to know that it did.

-4:20
Apparently they didn't read enough. The communication issue was due to NATO, the Moscow signal event, and later EPRI and high voltage powerlines everywhere. The controversy came from the government lying and hiding data so they could put radar wherever they wanted. This itself was built on suppression of medical devices in the 20's.

-Electrohypersensitivty is not based on self reporting. There are objective measures which are not attributable to nocebo. There are also in vitro studies that show cells respond the same way regardless of hypersensitivty, validating the 1960's Soviet knowledge that it was a hypothalamic adrenal pituitary axis degeneration, or some other high level compensatory failure.

-~5:08
Crowd psychology Tavistock nonsense. Cell phones don't save lives if they sterize and brain damage you, which is what the whole body of data indicates. Conveniently narrow scope, eh? Always split them into shades of grey.

-5:20
WHO is a political organization and is thoroughly compromised. Refer to the link in the OP. Their shenanigans are well documented, and I have their own books from the 80's to prove it.

The video was propaganda and or severely uninformed. Engage with the data yourself. I may go through the research they report and elaborate more.