[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.5706140 [View]
File: 84 KB, 1280x521, 1360281593514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5706140

His way of winning is denying everything the other side says, even when he is proved wrong, then using loose fallacies and creating strawmen for you to get sucked into. If you actually pay attention, his arguments never change, even when they are proven wrong without a shadow of doubt.

>> No.5356020 [View]
File: 84 KB, 1280x521, 1354063344493.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5356020

>>5356016
bro you got tricked hard. that's a quote from Mein Kampf.

>> No.4805419 [View]
File: 84 KB, 1280x521, meinkampf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4805419

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_controversy

>An epidemiological connection between silicofluorides, an industrial byproduct which is used to fluoridate much of the U.S. water, and lead uptake in children was observed in a 2000 study.[24] A 2006 U.S. CDC-funded study was unable to replicate the results,[25] which the original researchers responded to in a 2007 rebuttal.[26] Aside from the lead connection, concerns are raised as to whether silicofluorides might have different effects on the body than sodium fluorides, and silicofluorides have not been rigorously tested for safety.

welp we've never really tested it, but take our word that its good for you!

>The [water fluoridation] studies that were presented to me were selected and showed only positive results. Studies that were in existence at that time that did not fit the concept that they were "selling," were either omitted or declared to be "bad science." The endorsements had been won by coercion and the self-interest of professional elites. Some of the basic "facts" presented to me were, I found out later, of dubious validity. We are brought up to respect these persons in whom we have placed our trust to safeguard the public interest. It is difficult for each of us to accept that these may be misplaced.

Its always funny how the statists revert to mockery and name calling and demands for impossible proof when the burden of proof lies on them

>> No.4779217 [View]
File: 84 KB, 1280x521, 1299936497320.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4779217

>>4779200
This one?

>> No.4186591 [View]
File: 84 KB, 1280x521, 1299936497320.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4186591

>>4186571
You are like a baby bird (Jew) learning to fly (deceive the goyim).

That's not even a good use of the begging the question fallacy. It's way too transparent.

>> No.3609581 [View]
File: 84 KB, 1280x521, 1313585705001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3609264
>BUT IT DOESN'T MATTER SHE DEFAULTS TO HER POSITION THE NEXT DAY.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]