/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12067815
>you admit that the real numbers at the neighborhood of infinity do not follow the same laws as the numbers in the neighborhood of 0
No I don't. All real numbers follow the axioms in Section 5.2. Again, you've chosen to "raise a straw man." By the axioms of section 5.2, the implication you gave holds in the neighborhood of the origin but does not hold in the neighborhood of infinity. Fail harder, shitcunt.

> neighborhood of infinity were never mentioned or used by Riemann
The Riemann hypothesis was never mentioned by Gauss or Euler, or any of their contemporaries, and yet somehow we still think it is important. How do you think that works?

>>12053899
Free particles do move on straight lines. Massless photons even move on straight lines in gravity. Many people have criticized my solution to RH but I don't believe anyone has shown a flaw in my paper. Pic related, the main criticism is that my solution must be considered inadmissible because I have introduced a new technique.

Here is the best paper I wrote about it:
Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237