/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12585218
>do you think these legless lizards speciated at all in 100 million years they had a global habitat distribution?
>naaaahhh

something

>>9557029
The fact that she made decisions without my approval means she will soon be relieved of her duties.
The position of vice president is now open anon, would you like to try and apply?

>>9544620
>>9544624
>>9544626
But where's the gay (i.e. non-tranny) sex?

>>9508771
You need to prove that the partial sum converges uniformly, not just the terms in the sum lmfao.
Also this is high school calculus, not analysis. Actual analysis involves sheaves.
>>9508843
Meyer-Vietoris sequence.
>>9509546
Except Hoschchild cohomology groups are used in geometric quantization and construction of Yang-Mills theory on deformed principal [math]G[/math]-bundles where [math]G[/math] is a semisimple Lie group.

>>9424207
Oh he meant one that can sustain stable qubits and is just studying the effects of decoherence on quantum algos. Thogh many theoretical models using non-Abelian anyons and topological excitations as qubits has been proposed, and some are pretty close to actual being implemented in QC. It wouldn't be far-fetched at all to think that decoherence-free QC can be constructed sometime down the line.

>>9312152
Why do you say that?

>>9233155
>mathematical formalism
Renormalization is literally just a shift in energy scale. It's justified via physical arguments so there does not exist mathematical arguments for why it can be done at all.

>>8808927

>>8798623
Why does sucking cock make me hard as rock but I'm not even an engineer?

>>8748687
LL is great if you want to feel like a retard. But I learned classical field theory and QM from LL as well and I am a retard so you may be able to do it too.
There are a few standard texts on QFT (Schrednicki, Schroeder, Bjorken and Drell, etc.) for physics students, and they all have some level of handwaving. This is inevitable since they all need to cover some form of Feynman diagrams and the functional integrals in their generating functionals are far from rigorously defined. Those books are good if you're fine with that but if you're not then I'd suggest you start with them and then move on to books on non-perturbative approaches in QFT.

>>8690783
Fugg :DDDD
>>8690803
Well you're right since everyone is creaming themselves over how you're not around for so long.
I told them that you became my pet and that you're not allowed to use the internet.

>>8627440
Not if they moan like a girl.

>be physicist
>find a few typos and errors in a mathematical text I'm reading
>mail the author the errata
>he sends me $10 for it
>mfw