/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9007447
>>9007452
>The problem is that the evidentiary basis is inaccessible to the average person and yet you're asking them to make a leap of faith in giving broad executive powers to a group of people.
>You're demanding people accept "evidence", that they have no basis to judge or evaluate, in order to create a ruling caste that makes decisions based on said "evidence".
This is true of practically any technical field, and yet nobody sees a NWO conspiracy in the development of antibiotics or the production of better fertilizers.
It sounds like you're arguing against basing crucial decision-making on anything too complicated for the Average Joe to understand. And that's how we get Trumpian foreign policy tbqh.

>>8994459
Any questions?