/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14507316
>the denier will argue
"No", lol. We deny, sometimes we don't mention the reason for your own benefit (how nice of us)

>denying observational empirical evidence of gas properties
And magically emitting heat with no other source isn't one of them. Long story short it "emits heat" because the sun gives it the energy, the actual heat to be re-emitted. And if it keeps giving it less and less and less then what is the problem exactly? We need more insulation.

Also that's a correlation, less sun=more CO2. Must be the cause amiright? The data only agrees with me because I can plot the two together on a graph and show how they're correlated to each other.