/sci/ - Science & Math

was it all just a giant freak accident>??

Something can't come from nothing

What do you think about the evidences against the Big Bang?

>The Horizon Problem: The universe's background radiation is remarkably uniform, which is puzzling because, according to the Big Bang theory, there hasn't been enough time since the beginning of the universe for light or other signals to travel between the furthest regions of space to even out these temperatures.

>The Flatness Problem: The universe appears to be flat (in a geometric sense), but the Big Bang theory suggests that for this to be the case, conditions in the early universe would have had to be set to an extremely precise degree, which some argue is unlikely.

>The Magnetic Monopole Problem: The Big Bang theory predicts the existence of magnetic monopoles (isolated magnetic charges), but none have been observed.

>Galaxy Formation and Distribution: The Big Bang theory does not adequately explain the large-scale structure of the universe, including the distribution and formation of galaxies.

>Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The existence of dark matter and dark energy, which are necessary to explain observations under the Big Bang framework, is still largely hypothetical. Some critics argue that the need for these unseen, undetected elements might point to gaps in the theory.

>Age of the Universe vs. Age of Objects: There have been observations of stars and galaxies that appear to be older than the estimated age of the universe according to the Big Bang theory, although these observations are often contested or reinterpreted.

>Singularity Problem: The Big Bang theory begins with a singularity, an infinitely dense point, which is a concept that current physics, including General Relativity, cannot explain or describe.

>The Baryon Asymmetry Problem: The observed imbalance between matter and antimatter in the universe is not currently explained by the Big Bang theory, leading to questions about how and why matter came to dominate.

>>15813542
>Every single example of the Big Bang shows a point-like singularity exploding
Pic related is what I mean.

Looking at the pic you get a sense the at the Big Bang the universe was compactified to a single point some time, even though the big bang says it the universe was dense and compact at every point.

How can there be nothing and then suddenly something?

There is literally not "nothing" in space. Every centimeter of space is "something"

Kek. Absolute clown world.

What religious cosmology most aligns with the scientific one? Did any of them get close?

Something can't come from nothing

Big bang was a reaction to the "atheistic" steady state theory, and propagated my fairy tale believers because it made them feel better about burning Giordano Bruno alive without apology to this day. Michaelson Morley wouldn't have even detected the existance of air if it had been calibrated for it. "Red shift" is a natural function of all waves. CMB is the same temperature at all points in time therefore making a laughingstock of the idea that its "the afterglow of the big bang". I am not here to debate. I am better than you, because if anything I have the courage to say what you already know, and if you didn't already know then "get good" and stop wasting out fucking time, money and energy with your fake fucking bullshit.

Look, we all know it's fake. Occams rasor. All logical evidence points to an infinite and eternal fractal universe. Aether is real. Time dilation is fake. Atoms are galaxies in an infinite fractal, etc...

Where do people who know the truth congregate and is there any collection of resources for the truth?

Modern cosmology is for plebs and sheep. Where is the good stuff?

>random dude asks “what caused the Big Bang?”
>nothing lol. everything started with le big bang. your question is nonsensical btw
this is literally what they are advertising to the general population. why are physicists and popsci journalists such subhumans when it comes to this? why do they assume that the average person uses terms like “time” or “before” or “universe” or “the beginning” like they do?
do they even consider that most of the time the question being asked is ontological/metaphysical, and no one has a clue about its context under a conventional physics and general relativity framework?
>when we say nothing caused the Big Bang, we really mean that it’s outside of our reach as physicists, but I’m not gonna say that to you. I will assume that you somehow know what we mean by this.
>also when we talk about “everything” or “universe”, we won’t bother letting you know that we are referring to everything under physics only. So what if the majority of people confuse it with ontology and reality.

retard here, but nothing more retarded than a physicist who cant explain physical concepts to a non-physicist.

>the universe started from a singularity
then how is it a singularity? It clearly wasn’t “shrinking infinitely”. it stopped shrinking at some point and started expanding

>there was no “before” the big bang because time as a physical property started existing with the big bang.
why? did time not exist during the “infinite shrinking”? What am I missing? if time was infinitely in the past then you can’t say there was no “before” the Big Bang.

>there was a very dense matter, then it turned into atoms and electrons.
what is matter here? how can something be dense if there is no space or atoms?

Words like "before" or "after" simply do not exist if we are to believe that before the big bang there was nothing. But belief is a concept of time, to believe means a constant. So rather the truest words to describe what was "before" the big bang is: The big bang. In essence, time has always existed, it has never not existed. How could it have not existed in a non-existence state? If it didn't exist, it simply wouldn’t exist. The bigger picture is obvious, the universe has always existed. Now I'm sure this is something to do with some philosophy about trusting what you can see. In a sense that is true. If your eyes see an optical illusion that doesn't make it any less true, just a different level of truth. The laws of this universe were made if we are to believe, in an instant yet ask yourself this, consider just what truly is nothing. Nothing is not just the absence or a state before something. It exists as a conundrum, nothing as a concept would not exist since nothing would exist. So, the question of why is there something rather than nothing simply cannot exist. Nothing inherently implies that nothing exists as something, even as thin as just being the concept or idea. So logically if there was nothing then it has always existed as something. The universe has always existed, it has never not existed it has never been in a concept such as nothing.

We don't observe galaxies condensing into singularity as we look deep into time.

Galaxies are as far from us then as they are today as we look deep into time.

The cosmic web would take trillions of years to form, let alone 14 billion, without imagined forces like dark energy which only exist to conform reality to a theory rather than the other way around.

The explanation for CMB is laughable. Why would we observe a steady radiation from every point 14 billion years after it happened that doesnt even red shift in accordance with the rest of the big bang theory?

You believe in Big Bang theory because it is literally heresy to this day to question a moment of creation in the Western World ever since the Inquisition and execution of Giordano Bruno. You people are brainwashed sheep. Not scientists.

This universe is an infinite and eternal fractal, almost exactly like Bruno predicted.

If you were to shrink a galaxy to atomic size while maintaining its angular momentum stars would orbit the galactic center at the exact same "RPM" as an electron around a nucleus. They even look identical. Go Google images of "electron cloud configurations".

All mediums redshift at distance. Air. Water. Aether.

The Michaelson Morely never disproved aether, and infact aether is confirmed by the gravitational halos that surround galaxies. Aether IS "dark matter".

The CMB is simply the radiation that comes off the infinite "fractal" of space.

Atheists and their heathen steady state theory are BTFOed!!!

My favorite way to dunk on atheists who deny the big bang (which was rightly invented by a priest - ummm someone call the based beauro am i right? - and ratified by a pope to combat the literal atheist heresy of believing the universe is an eternal, procedural, competely algorithmic and fractal like structure) is that the further we look back I space we can SEE literally SEE the galaxies converge into singularity! Go look at the James Webb pictures and see for yourself how all the galaxies get closer and closer until we can see them come out of an infinitely dense point! I'm not gaslighting or lying that's what atheist scum do!

My other slam dunk for Big Bang Theory is how the images of distant galaxies from James Webb are "smeared across millions of light years, and also magnified to appear bigger than our sun, since distant galaxies are receding faster than light, and when their light was emitted those galaxies were only a few light years away from us according to the completely correct 100% fact and infallible Big Bang Theory!

Take your vaccines kids! You won't die of a heart attack! No one has that's fake news! I Feel like I should mention that too since all these commie atheists think that we're predatory. It's not like we would false flag our own nation to steal oil or anything! So you can trust us!

>>15069532

If the universe came from nothing, Can humans create a small big bang from nothing too?

What's this i keep hearing about the big bang being BTFO due to the James Webb telescope photos?

Let's do it...

Like, I now it is not an explosion. I know it happened 13.7 billion years ago. But was there time dilation during the Big Bang? Like could first seconds after BB last for billions years? If no how could the whole not observable universe become infinitely big right after Big Bang? If I had an indestructible time machine would I be able to reach point 0?

What happened before the big bang?

What was before the big bang? How could something like the universe come out of nothing? Wtf?

What lies beyond Universe? What is Universe expanding into?