/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16218241
oh noooooo not le heckin vaxxxxxx!!!!!!

>>16158884
wh.. whaat??

What are /sci/'s thoughts on aliens? Do you think there's an advanced civilization out there? If there isn't, then it's even scarier.

What if phd's are using chatgpt to write their journals?

>the bulk

What we're seeing is just the shadow of something much spoopier

>length contraction

>>15749420
Wtf how do you know all of this?

>>15633330
I had delayed puberty and had to be injected with growth hormone at the start of high school to induce my physical development. I've been formally diagnosed with ADHD since the start of college and being properly treated and medicated with ER made me into a 4.0 student. Bros...?

>>15556516
Does the rover have a pink bow on?

Retard take here: Why are axioms just assumed to be true? We literally take them for granted. What are we gonna do if one of them actually turns out to be utter bullshit?

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2791253
>Among males 16 to 24 years of age, the excess number of myocarditis events per 100000 vaccinees in the 28-day risk periods after the first dose of BNT162b2 was 1.55 (95% CI, 0.70-2.39) events and after the second dose was 5.55 (95% CI, 3.70-7.39) events, and it was 1.75 (95% CI, −0.20 to 3.71) events after the first dose of mRNA-1273 and 18.39 (95% CI, 9.05-27.72) events after the second dose (Table 2).

> Excess events of myocarditis were 3.26 (95% CI, 1.90-4.61) events per 100000 individuals with a positive test result among all males, and 1.37 (95% CI, −0.14 to 2.87) events per 100000 individuals with a positive test result among males aged 16 to 24 years (eTable 7 in the Supplement).

>data collected from August 2020 onward
>Most of the younger age groups were vaccinated from July to September 2021, and very few during the spring.

How can the rates differ so much for this age group? At first I thought maybe they were confounding/minimizing the rates for the infected cohort because they had already been vaccinated and rolled their one time risk myocarditis dice, as it were. ,However, given they started collecting data in the pre-vaccine era, that is pretty much ruled out. If anything it makes more sense to add the infection rate onto the vaccine rates, given they don't provide sterilizing immunity and so will have to 'roll the dice' again when they are infected post vaccine.

Does anyone have a non schizo explanation for these rates? I'm a big believer in vaccination as a technology, but if the new IFR rates published in the last week are accurate this really doesn't seem like good policy.

Is it true that men are attracted to women like their mothers

globeshitters we got too heckin cocky they found the ellipses!!!

>>14855091
>>14855113
Did the ruskies upgrade their HAARP clone, bros?

>>14766509
Hmm that's not good

>>14734923
>My BMI is 42.3
Anon you'd probably gain a few inches in height from losing weight. Not memeing, your bones and joints are significantly compressed
at the moment

I don't want to make an /x/ offtopic thread.

But isn't ironic, how you start as a 20 year old watching dumb videos about dinosaurs and le cool black science guy, start reading science and math books.

And 12 years later you end up with schizo shit about ancient geometrical rules about fractal shit in biology and physical phenomena and ancient religion mathematical knowledge about the spiritual world?

Again, not trying to make an offtopic thread, just want to see how many people here are at the level in their math and science studies where they start getting into weird religious shit, more at the philosophical kind of level of each field.

I mean, after some point in your journey, you can't stop ignoring the big elephant questions and that funny evidence that keeps just being downplayed.
But how much more evidence do I seriously have to keep downplaying?