/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8225300
>There is no absolute truths

>>7444207
I would have a good number of memes for you, but I'm choosing this good old one for brevity's sake

Best memes sci ever produced.

Post em all

Philosophy has no intellectual merit. A STEM person must study for several years, use all their intelligence and acquire a lot of expert knowledge before working in their own field. A philosopher on the other hand literally needs to qualifications. The only thing he ever does is holding opinions. Yes, that's all. "Philosophy" is a buzzword used by neckbearded high school dropouts and other failures who want to pretend they are deep or insightful for holding opinions. Because that's the only thing they can do, seeing as they lack the intellectual qualifications to work a real job. They like to pretend they are the only ones who hold opinions and their opinions are more correct than other people's opinions. Absolutely disgusting autistic douchebaggery.

>>7140162
Thank you for proving the uselessness of philosophy. Philosophy answers none of the questions in your post. It fails to provide an objective answer. All these questions are matters of opinions. Everyone can hold opinions. Philosophers are not better qualified to hold opinions.

>>7112729
Are you seriously claiming that every use of arguments qualifies as philosophy? That's a disgustingly uneducated claim, borderline anti-intellectual. But ironically it also undermines your own position by completely devaluing philosophy. If philosophy is merely the use of arguments, then every infant who barely learned to speak is a philosopher. You literally just admitted that philosophy has no intellectual merit at all, because the use of arguments is as natural for humans as breathing or walking.

>>7013588
>the hard problem of consciousness

>>6944203
>objectively a pseudo-intellectual meaningless circlejerk

Yes, philosophy. Please Lrn2words.