/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6301001
>To be fair, the fact that they know Jupiter is mostly gas is a feat of knowledge by itself
This cannot be true. That's as basic as knowing the earth is covered in water and soil.

You cannot fully explain to someone else what you experience.

>>5284336
>And they're multicellular organisms

>>5046721
>eigenvectors
>tensors
>Lagrangians
the fuck?

Superiority complexes...

Superiority complexes everywhere!

>that feel when you get up in the middle of the night because you have to piss, but then while pissing you feel lightheaded and pass out on the bathroom with your dick hanging out of your pants only to wake up 10 minutes later wondering what the fuck happened then go back to bed and wake up in the morning with the worst pain in your back because you feel on a hard floor
Seriously, what the fuck happened to me?

>>3969865
CNS! I am not worthy!

Capitalism IS anarchy in a secluded medium.

It parallels anarchy in that if you have More, you have Power. This system gives power to Average men whose intentions are molded by capitalistic society driving them gain more using what they already have by exercising their power over the weaker peoples.

Not only does this inequality promote MORE inequality, but it also degrades society. The brittle laws that keep our civilization from being totally anarchic are being contorted and "loop-holed" by bought politicians.

Capitalism has promoted a new face of anarchy.

I'm suffering from scientific withdrawal /sci/.

No studies that have come out this month have been the least bit interesting. Its all new advances in bomb detection or tank stealth or shit that deals with the military. Please, reassure me that scientific progress is not stagnating. Give me AI/Robotic, medicine, physics, SOMETHING!

Aren't you afraid of what will happen when we run out of important things we need to survive?

Or do you just think it's the future peoples problem?

Teach me about psycholgoy, /sci/.
Please?

>>3354790

http://www.spacenews.com/civil/110706-nasa-budget-cancel-webb.html

Congress, y u hate science so much?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadruple_bond
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintuple_bond
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sextuple_bond

What the fuck, chemistry.

We are the Chinese Room.

Us. Humans.

The universe passes us rules and we apply those rules but can we really be said to "understand" them?

The universe slips us a note telling us 1+1=2. We all know this and we all apply it. But in what sense do we understand the meaning of it?

if quantum fluctuations will eventually produce new universes, given enough time after the death of our own universe...

isn't it statistically inevitable that these fluctuations will eventually produce a universe in which such fluctuations never happen, making it impossible for any universes to ever be born again?

pic related, it's mfw i realize that existence is still eventually doomed even with the sunniest interpretation possible.

>>2532168

>dat poop

An insanely rich madman offers you $10 billion to eat 1/16th of all the poop you've ever pooped. You have a week to do it, and because the madman is also magic, you are guaranteed not to become ill in any way from this.

Do you attempt it?

Are humans the manifestation of the universe trying to make sense of itself?

/sci/, MAKE ME THE ULTIMATE TOILET

What is the difference between Gas and Liquid? Besides the fact that gases turn into liquids and vice versa, they are very similar. Both flow and eb, they have currents, they mix with their own kind similarly.

The only reason I think we have very different notions of them is that liquids are generally thicker, but aside from that, could we not have under water "birds" that would otherwise sink, but use the same principles as flight? Or Airborne "fish" that float in the air, but swim through the oxygen streams?

Are Gases and Liquids truly so different?

>>1641271

how is bubble formed?