/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9632693
>you sure about that?
Yes.
>Hey parents, your child can have [genetic trait], but he will be sterile, and you will never have grandchildren.
>Uhh, maybe not that, then.

>in a market there will be preferred products.
You neglect to take the human condition into calculation. People don't want a blank slate perfect human, they want THEIR children, who have THEIR traits and THEIR genes, to be better in some ways, no to turn into a "model-T".
>the reason we have crops that are extremely homogenized is not that we thought that was aesthetic
EXACTLY. Aesthetics weren't a priority. In children, they would be.

Your arguments are incredibly short sighted, and you seem to think that for people, (parents) there's no difference between plants and children.

>mfw physicists think they're "people"