/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15515770
>Gentile babies
First post nails it.
Jews HATE non-Jewish whites. HATE them worse than the leftist Nazi's hated the Jews.

Jews have not been "persecuted" for thousands and thousands of years for "no reason".

>>10992114
>. stop reading jordam peterson.
who?
you mean this guy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoXsbD0j70c


>>10992114
>whether or not capitalism has corrupted the whole thing, and whether or not jews mastered capitalism while christians had some laws against "usury" is another issue. but the idea that academic institutions are cucked by capitalist shit is pretty tenuous, since even jordan peterson retards think somehow marxists control academia
you simply CANNOT stop with your biggoted and antisemitic ranst can you? I started a thread for the discussions of solutions to the NIGGER problem and you always bring it back to politics. get help.

>>8564907

/pol/ consists entirely of people who have found themselves rejected from society because they would not accept the consensus. nobody else is attracted to it.the vast majority of people on /pol/ conceal their beliefs and ideas from others in public because to reveal them would endanger their life. anyone that has something to gain from conforming to the group considers /pol/ to be disgusting. however, society-at-large is quickly going bankrupt and is finding it very hard to sufficiently reward those who adhere to it.


>>8564923

>All you've done in this thread is say
>no you're wrong

that's all anyone ever does. everyone has their reasons for believing what they believe, and the ideas that people adopt reflect the ideas from which they stand to gain.

society has fractured. you think i have no arguments. i think you have no arguments. we have no common ground. i think you're as retarded as you think i am. this is, largely, the state of things in the west right now. there is a cultural divide. there is an ideological civil war.

>It's a common stance within philosophy that speech to incite violence should be punishable. This is because such speech has no value anyways.

do you think that anyone on my side of the fence feels free to openly advocate violence? we don't have that luxury, not yet. you don't consider such speech to have any value. other people think that it does have value. no one is changing their mind here.

you appeal to 'a common stance'. the people you're speaking to take it for granted that calling something 'a common stance' is an insult. they think you're just looking for social approval on something, whether or not it's correct.

you are a child if you don't realize all of this. fortunately, anyone who recognizes this state of complete separation has an advantage over those who still think that the 'well known proven facts of common knowledge and science' will prevail for them, if only there is enough shaming and ostracization.