/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14586409
>It's ok, they still need me to unwrap the ingredients, clean the kitchen then stay out of the way of the robot-cook, the robot-waitress and the robot-cashier.
Of course they don't replace master chief yet but preparing junk food isn't rocket science, the only thing preventing it was software and it's likely already more productive than the retard who still don't understand why those "costly" robots replaced everyone else.
https://thespoon.tech/report-80-percent-of-restaurant-jobs-could-be-taken-over-by-robots/

So stop exaggerating failure rate or moving the goalpost about robots who are being used right now, free cooks to work on other tasks, saving you from hiring more, cost less than humans overall and don't have human lodging, transport, sickness problems.
Robots arms like these aren't superscience, it's your typical food-rated robotic arms with a more clever OS you reboot and update once in a while. Asking for a technician once in a while won't even eat your profit margin and who know if you have guarantee for those.