/sci/ - Science & Math

>>1225136

And here it is. This sounds so awesome I hope it's actually feasible.

http://www.mediafire.com/?jnqoftmymge

>>1225143

There is actually the very frightening possibility that ocean acidification driven by global warming could kill off the vast majority of oxygen-producing sea plants. Almost as bad as the breathing-battery-acid scenario Peter Ward has in this articles:

>>1220627

Anyway, acidification would take at least a century to get to that point, so I hope we can get our shit in shape by then.

>>1038724

We are not speaking of what the greenhouse gases are doing at any infinitesimally specific point in time, but rather their effects over a period of time. Water vapour does not drive climate, as explained in an earlier post, and in fact has a small cooling effect due to cloud albedo. Therefore water vapour does not constitute a major driving force behind recent climatic changes. If you don't understand what the Harries paper has to do with our discussion I'm not sure I can help you. I can only suggest that you return to school for adult education classes in high school science.

>alarmists

Lol. I always find it funny when science denialists think what they've heard on Fox is an example of alarmism. Bitches don't know about my hydrogen sulfide kill mechanism for the P-T mass extinction event.