/sci/ - Science & Math

Was this your inspiration? >>>/lounge/1314086478
If so, I am disappoint. RedCream is doing a better job than you.

Concerning the troll awards: Now that EK is gone, who comes next?
I'd vote for mathgenius "not trolling".

>>4213774

>>4191843

What is with this paradigm we have that there is somehow a debate on whether or not "life begins at conception"? It doesn't. But the people who say that it doesn't, because they are pro-choice, don't understand why either.

Life is a continuous process. The sperm and egg that made the zygote were alive as well. It's all continuous. Life only "began" 4 billion years ago, and even then, it's still very fuzzy on when you first start to classify increasingly complex, and self-replicating molecules as "life."

To say that "life begins at conception" is ignorant of the entire field of biology, and even those who say it don't because of their position on abortion have got it wrong too, because they don't even know why.

>>3634459

>>3458194
Because the airports are privately owned, right?

>>3114903
Yep. Thanks!

>>2490913
Actually, yes, I am having fun. Isn't this what science is about, proving shit? Well, I've proved my point, time and time again, so why aren't you doing something about this new gained knowledge? "Robotics"

>mfw when I can read the thoughts of everyone I see

Infinity. God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God, God creates Man, Man creates God

tell me how earlier you did what was

>>2321140
i cured myself. u mad? i just want other people to know. better eating apple seeds than paying for a cocktial of drugs with less than <5% successful results