/sci/ - Science & Math

It'll have to have a totally private subset of memory unique to something it can identify as the self, or its ego perhaps(?). Gonna need to start small on the interests, then refine each one after some (ample) time.
By its own standards it'll need to know what style of learning it can interpret the most efficiently. If it has the appropriate interacting energy (and freedom) it could analyze/prioritize its own group of (possible) learning abilities to help see further in a way that wouldn't seem so un-human.

The biggest thing I see in the near future is taking that next big step. It learns..., and we have so much for it to learn but also so much for it to distinguish between truth and fact, so 'that' new information can be interpreted in the ways we've never imagined. Remember this, mercury in a mirror isn't as bad as no self-image in the rear.

>>15157750
Invented expressions of disocvered relationships.

>>15071598
>It's absurd to say he "just introduces formulas without explanations, proofs, intuition or historical background."
In all honesty i meant that only for the Schrodinger equation, it completely pissed me off when he introduced that equation in the first page and didn't give any explanations for it except "so there's this thing called the 'wave-function' which we get by solving an equation i pulled out of thin air", picrel is the first section of Griffiths which is at the first page.
The Schrodinger equation is at the center of quantum mechanics yet Griffiths spends less that one page introducing it, how am i supposed to take this book seriously? I tried to go along with this hoping that he would provide some explanations in later chapters, but i reached Chapter 2 with Griffiths and he still doesn't provide any explanation for where the Schrodinger equation comes from. Overall i got the impression that Griffiths is "QM but for people who already know it".

Anyway, enough ranting about Griffiths, i appreciate the two anons >>15070889 >>15070944 who gave recommendations but i did not find them useful, Isham seems too advanced and i don't like video lectures, so i decided to search for a QM text for myself and i found "An Introduction to Quantum Physics" by A. P. French and Edwin F. Taylor, this book has everything that i want and its explanations are excellent, the presentation of subjects in historical order is exactly what i was looking for.

>>14957479
>>14959091

>>12308737
thats the great new england idunow beetle.

it brings luck and stinky yellow substance to you.