[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.9397960 [View]
File: 103 KB, 1920x1080, 1488294775841.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.7978949 [View]
File: 116 KB, 1920x1080, 1446540573423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Why anyone would use continuous distributions when the reals are so unreal is beyond me

>> No.7975566 [View]
File: 103 KB, 1920x1080, 1446540573423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I want a graduate to answer to him.

>> No.7936098 [View]
File: 103 KB, 1920x1080, 1436892197027.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

lel, no.
N is created only to have The principle of induction, which is the most dubious inference rule of all.

>> No.7931596 [View]
File: 103 KB, 1920x1080, 1444238311604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Made me wonder if people can carry out science without the least bit of understanding of science.
yes they can. Feynman, Hawking are the most famous scientist who are not able to think outside a graduate level of their fields.

In fact, it is even detrimental for scientists to focus on why they do things, on the goals of their works. They even despise this and claim that these question slow science down...

View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]