/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8415949
For this problem, you turn this crank.
For that problem, you turn that crank.
If the problem looks unfamiliar, you're fucked.

>>7668827

yep

>>7654704
>It's basically the dumbed down engineer's version of analysis

No metric spaces -> not analysis. It's the calculus book for people would already have some incomplete calculus exposure like in a non-AP calculus class in high school or are supplementing another book with it at the same time.

>optimization and related rates, topics not covered in any analysis course (including Spivak).

Did you miss
>poor motivation, no applications

Yeah, Spivak is a shittier version of Apostol or Courant/John but its fanboys won't shut up if it's not on the list.

>Stewart

A terrible textbook that teaching you nothing but pattern matching to previous worked problems.

Is economics a science?

>>6612801
>solving problems by pattern matching to other worked out ones

Biggest retards in math courses. Physics will gladly welcome you.

>>6572172
what's wrong with rotating the 8?

How do I prove that <span class="math">{(1 + \frac{x}{n})}^n[/spoiler] converges to <span class="math">e^x[/spoiler]?
I cannot into series.

I'm having such a hard time with my Calc class right now...
can anyone offer me some help?

I'm trying to optimize the shape of a cylinder with the given Volume of 1000cm^3,
now i'm not asking for you guys to do my homework for me, just a little bit of help, or a push in the right direction would be awesome.

Science jokes.