/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15557307
Yes, you can't prove anthropogenic climate change from simply the current rate of warming compared to past warming, because at least with what we have seen so far, we can't be 100% certain it's outside of the historical norm.

The Geophysical evidence we get from studying the atmosphere and radiation flux is the actual 'smoking gun' for anthropogenic climate change.
We know that various GHG emissions are making large changes to Earth's heat budget since we can directly measure it.