/sci/ - Science & Math

>my face when I realized I learned more from researching stuff myself and getting /sci/ to inspire me in my endeavors and learning than school ever did

Wrap a smartphone and GPS tracker in bubblewrap with a whole for the camera, put it in a clear plastic ball and screw on rails to the side. Build a railgun with enough capacitors and power to launch the smartphone kilometers up into the atmosphere. Post video on /sci/ and Youtube.

Third and final Jodie Foster reaction image.

This is very science related. She acted on Contact and had to get to know the actual sciency person Eleanor Arroway was based of.

>>2628426

>In any case, if potential people in the future want happiness, they can do what I'm doing, too. If you want to argue against my original point, prove that my proposed lifestyle is less happy. I don't care if it contributes to less technological development, as that's an arbitrary goal.

There won't be any potential future if everyone chooses that path.

Jesus Christ. People here are saying humanity is destroying itself, but this is exactly what you are proposing: Luddism. Plain, clear-cut luddism. Abandoning the cities for what you project to be a better existance in the woods, living in villages, fucking Tracer Tong mode.

Don't you think life should be more than sitting by the river contemplating your bellybutton? I'm all up for happiness, sure, but it does not require us to abandon all we have done!

We have come so far, through all the bottlenecks, two technological singularities, we have split the atom, traveled to other worlds, began interpreting a mere glimpse of what's out there, and you want to turn back now? Because the idle life is "happier"? Lest anybody work or do anything!

Enjoy your society of leisure. You can have it all you want. But stay out of the way of progress, and if you treehouse is in a piece of land we need to build something important, we'll burn it. Since you insist that places with abundance are everywhere, you wouldn't have problems with a nomadic life.

It's luddism, any way you put it. You are just giving up because of a little stress because you can't bear the thought of not being able to fully catch up with progress.

>>2628428

And the resources are?

>>2416760

>Thread 2353609 has already been archived.

>It is probably still waiting to be reviewed by the mods, which means it can take a few days until it is available in the archive.

>mfw

>>2349197

I love that movie and you will not take that away from me with your empty troll statements!

Change is coming.

>>2297561