/sci/ - Science & Math

jaj

I was once banned for 30 days for opening a thread with this :

No matter how hard you guys try to deny it, Most of you rely on the exact same fundamental aspects of life as most theists do...
(most because there are exeptions like anti-theists and orthodox religious.)

The main reasons people really are theist is because they rely on present day culture, people they have trust in, and thier own feelings.

You guys do exactly the same in some extend... Where else can one get his moral values from ?

Anyway im not saying theists reject sceince. Most theists agree with sceintific method and the reliability of observation(exept in u.s.a.).
Just like most atheists are not rejecting every aspect of culture, people they have trust in, and thier own feelings.(exept nihilists etc.)

Theists just think when it comes to the subject of God, sceince is useless because the subject is beyond empirical knowledge. and therefor prefere to rely on philosophy, other people`s account`s, or it`s own feelings.

>>2485909
fuck you guys are so close minded i bet that one chases Zorak back go to /x/ only to never return.

>>2457444
For some reason my ban was shortened from 13 days to 3 days. after appeal was reviewed. Here is the full version...

I believe i deserve to be unbanned because sci desperatly needs different voices like mine.

I`m not intrested in religion versus science threads either.
But sometimes it is necessary to look at the compatibility and similaritys between the two.
Considering what subjects fall within the field of sceince and what not is a sceintific question itself! And that is what these threads always run into. for example see
green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/2395493
green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/2382960

Just like i try to participate and shine a different light on other sceintific subjects as well.
My intentions are not trolling, i just can`t help it that some insist on rejecting a differnt opinion.
The problem with sci is mainly those atheist kiddies who never learned to stfo when thier arguments are invalidated flawlessly. And keep bumping while making an idiot out of themselves, these are the one`s that deserve to be banned.

Please note that lots of replyers agree with my approaches all the time. Don`t get fooled by kiddies using proxy`s to report a thread multiple times.


For the sake of free speech don`t establish janitors on /sci/ ! !
You should know it will ruin the board that`s already biased as fuck.

I admit i do sometimes make extraordinary claims, diguesed as someone else just to kickstart a discussion.
I apologize for this behaviour and promise to stop manipulating legitimate discussions in that way.

Kind regards, Tautoulogic

>>2450094
>>2450094

Seems you don`t take in account the butterfly effect OP(or whover came up with the twin thing).

Watch and learn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfD1OsP-Bv8

>>2424635

I would rather see pong being the "new coolest thing" in stead of crysis.

If it would save millions of people from starvation.

And stop this playing with money, a game moralless people will have the advantage in over people who reconsider thier ethical values, i would rather drive an Opel cadett yes.

anyway what you were saying isn`t necessarily true in the fisrt place. that`s what the whole movie is about.

>>2417382

Zeitgeist == neo nazi propoganda

go back to /new/

I love you /sci/ ! !

Here`s a painting i made for you ! !