/sci/ - Science & Math

Draw a cube on a paper. Now have a book where on every page there is drawn a cube.
Each piece of paper represents the 3D space.
But since your book is thick, you get 4D.
You get your tesseract.

>>5230918
>That's the chance that any one of the 3 are heads, not the first one.

Let X be heads and Y tails.

Possible results are:
XXY, XYX, YXX
First coin was heads in two situations out of three.

>>4851975
>getting confused by "irregardless"
every fucking time

A rather odd behavior, 'miss'.

Nothing is preventing alteration; humans have idea capability and great imagination. If I wanted I could understand my language as a weapon, rather than a normal definition. This would be me piercing the top level with a light (an idea) and it lying in the bottom level; for it to lay on this layer it has to make sense. Truth is essential, I cannot consider words weapons if they do not resemble them – it is a personal conjecture, if it makes sense to me personally then it’s true; it is self-control. Not all personal truth is impersonal truth, I may have appeared controlled to myself, but to others I may not. This is where probability steps up to the mark, if I see words as weapons and I understand it, but it is not comprehended in the minds of others, my decision can be over-ruled (I could be wrong impersonally); the probability is the chance of success, I may or may not know this.

To learn probability you require knowledge, the more you know the more probable that your statements will be correct/beneficial. The lowest probability is 0%-chance of victory, it is amount of darkness and exists unseen. The highest is 100%-chance of victory; it is the focusing onto a singularity of darkness; definite loss or definite gain. You could run around saying that you’re Spiderman, the probability of you getting stopped is pretty high, your chance of success is low; therefore doing so isn’t recommended – it is true if you succeed (if no-one stopped you from your statement, you said you were a super hero and understood the reasoning beneath it, you would be a super hero personally; the same applies for words being weapons).

Math.pow(-1,Math.round(Math.random())) × ∞

I herd Galois got shot in a duel or some shit?
Iz dat true? Sucker was young.

>>2898050
you can take them down, but it will require a few centuries

>>2859487
she's jewish, jewish people attract money
it's sort of like magnets maaaan just

kidding ofc..
but oh dear OP...

WHY ARE U MAD?

>>2808800
1) multiply with -1
2) extract square root
3) multiply with -1
4) ...?
5) profit!

the only question is: can she call black people niggers without being considered racist?

>>2749170
why can't we say the conjecture is true after so many tests?
an exhaustive proof cannot be successful considering the set of natural numbers has Aleph 0 cardinality

So acccording to her page, she's in high school until 2012 studying theoretical physics.

>>2215362

>writes textbooks on philosophy
>his life consists of sitting in an armchair dreaming up whatever he thinks might sound intelligent
>his face when

at least you'll (hopefully) be contributing to scientific advancement

the professor trolled you bro

pic related, it's his face

Star wars

>>1866624
Don't be preposterous, the reapers have been proven to be a myth.

So radioactive dating is not reliable? The age of the earth...

>>1294139

>ph.d in mathematics
>any job i want
>300k starting

I have one eye and I was still able to take a double-blind study.