/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8819640
What you are saying is reasonable, especially the part about what causes what and is it just a correlation. Obviously NO actual mechanisms have been suggested.

BUT, it's funny that the table was originally doctored by the /pol/tard to show something fake AND they actually didn't even make it a point to check if the Mexicans, a growing minority actually fits their little theory. And as you know, Mexicans are a very important part of the whole race discussion, immigration etc.

It's just a fun way to show polfags have no idea what they are doing, when they post their charts, they have no idea what they are talking about in their little HBD bubble. Like when they post a sourceless picture of IQ curves and Asians are always on top. That's amusing to me that they repeatedly shoot themselves in the foot.

Here's an example.

>>8639423
>another pol-fag that doesn't get what a bell curve is
if you have an IQ of 110, you can be any race

it's not race that determines your intelligence, it's your positively correlated with IQ genes, different races have different frequencies of such genes, that's the whole point of selection and why the ashkenazi jews are so smart

and yeah, global warming is real, sorry

>>8607566
Colonial age is empirical evidence.
It is not, however empirical evidence that white kids are brighter than Asian kids. Empirical evidence to that effect are test scores, IQ scores all kinds of other scores, excluding verbal where there is equity. If you remove verbal the picture looks even worse for a white kid, statistically speaking.

Your historical argument can be chalked down to other factors than intelligence and is irrelevant to the facts on the ground. Also, as you know, depending on when in history you make it different races turn up superior - which suggests other things are involved. Yours is a counter-argument, but it simply doesn't hold, as I can ask you what were white people (aside from meds at certain times) doing all the time before the Colonial times? Faced with this inconvenient question your hypothesis blows up.

There is NO genetic evidence whites are superior to Asians, but there is to the contrary.
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-and-iq-related-genes/
Secondary source is an "alt-right" website.

And, yes, it all fits the psychometric data.