/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12021208
>when you admitted that using hyperreals is too complex for you.
That wasn't me. My criticism of the hyperreals is that they lack sufficient complexity. I needed for my own model something with a scale greater than Robinson's limiteds and less than his unlimiteds. This worked out to be the big part, pic related from
>Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
>https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237
which is taken as a binary quantity in Robinson's analytical framework, Big(x)=0 or Big(x)=1. As I derived it, Big(x) for X in R can take on all values between zero and one. This is the so-called "odd level of aleph" that I described in my previous work before switching research directions to pursue pure math. I was surprised, honestly, that no one had already come up with what i came up with. In my earlier physics stuff, I was writing about it like it must exist as something well known of which I myself was simply unaware. Turns out, I had to invent the whole thing because no one else ever did it.