/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12002960
>you're specifically talking about an infinity of different conscious entities all creating each other.
If I came off that way, that wasn't my intention. My intention isn't to defend simulation theory. I don't know what the actual nature of it is, because no one does. But what simulationists and the religious have in common is precisely this. All these factions are "onto something", so to say. None of them are entirely wrong. But they just don't quite know what that "something" is. I put to you that it's this. And that's really as much as can be said about this entire subject.