/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10368468
0.5 × 2 = 1
0.4 × 2 = 0.8
0.45 × 2 = 0.9
0.49 × 2 = 0.98
0.499 × 2 = 0.998
0.4999 × 2 = 0.9998
0.49999 × 2 = 0.99998
0.4(9999) × 2 = 0.(9999)8
0.4(x amt of 9's) × 2 = 0.(x amt of 9's)8

0.4(∞ 9's) × 2 = 0.(∞ 9's)8

>0.4999... ×2 = 0.999...8

>>10015663
>nothing can be greater than infinity
>nothing can travel faster than light
>C is an arbitrarily large real finite number
>infinity is an arbitrarily large real finite num-
FUCK

>>10003744
Your reply didn't actually challenge anything.

>believing wireless radio communication is a manmade concept
>believing no one would lie, ever, under any circumstance, certainly not about the origins of wireless, and most definitely not about harmful side effects
>implying we literally live in a perfect world and there exists no precedence on lies.

>>9871771
>implying a white british guy could have even a single non-deviant reason to be in thailand

>>9750607
>yfw you actually thought the reals were complete

>tfw you graduate as a math major

>>9725182
>"infinite sum just means finite to an arbitrary point which i wont proclaim where that is until I personally decide to make up how much information i want, so because i'm not saying which obviously finite point i'm going to end on, you can't tell me that i'm not doing it infinitely :^)"

>>9682775
Retard.
If the second lasted longer, the oscillation period of Caesium-133 might be 10GHz flat, which would ironically be more a sensible metric constant than the arbitrary measurement value based on the previous ephemeris second, and probably barely noticeable if it were redefined as such given 9.19GHz per ephemeris second is just 8% slower than a second where caesium's frequency was 10GHz flat, but that would throw all timekeeping out of whack and a day would instead be about 22 hours and 57 minutes.

So no you dongus, frequency really does rely on length of the time frame.

>>9537610
>the value of infinity is the value that doesn't exist

>>9476994
>

>>9408148
His brain was two sizes too small.

>>9387624
kek

Also no, setting a non-living camera to record a tree falling when no one is around will not satisfy as a result if the footage is destroyed before being observed by a living organism, and the moment of observing surviving footage no longer satisfies the question of nothing being around to hear it cause clearly you are around to do so.

You really do find the concept of reality's intangibility very difficult to understand.

>>9387179
>trying to read a book where all the letters literally fly off the page

>>9377266
Prove that I need to

>>9363597
I'm almost sure it had nothing to do with constantly exploding.

>>9341564
if its a self contained star generating energy that cannot escape, it's near infinite energy. It's a closed system that feeds back into itself. You have mistaken the fact thst it has mass with the fact it does not lose mass, unlike stars that radiate their energy away.

>>9307860
for(int i=0; i<fArray2D.length; i++){
[math]~[/math]for(int j=0; j<fArray2D[i].length; j++){
[math]\quad[/math]fArray2D[i][j] = somevisualshit.get(i, j);
[math]~[/math]}
}

>>9307538
>>9307547
>"y-you retard"