/sci/ - Science & Math

bump for help

This is the only one I'm having trouble with

You guys have helped me great this far!

I love you all so much

>>5528739

> helpful AI
> non-intrusive targeted advertising

>>5475370
>>5475352

[ ] Told
[ ] Not Told
[x] No Country for Told Men

>>5429671

+1

>>4692684
I feel this gem requires some acknowledgement.

>>4598607
mah nigga

>>4202489
Like Newtonian physics? Or ideal gas laws?

s

>anal

>>4013966

mfw this is the textbook we're using right now

>>3597013

>>3568757

>>3495651

>>3488776
Thanks, this helped me :D I'm going to try it this way.

What does /sci/ think of the CTMU?


The real universe has always been theoretically treated as an object, and specifically as the composite type of object known as a set. But an object or set exists in space and time, and reality does not. Because the real universe by definition contains all that is real, there is no "external reality" (or space, or time) in which it can exist or have been "created". We can talk about lesser regions of the real universe in such a light, but not about the real universe as a whole. Nor, for identical reasons, can we think of the universe as the sum of its parts, for these parts exist solely within a spacetime manifold identified with the whole and cannot explain the manifold itself. This rules out pluralistic explanations of reality, forcing us to seek an explanation at once monic (because nonpluralistic) and holistic (because the basic conditions for existence are embodied in the manifold, which equals the whole). Obviously, the first step towards such an explanation is to bring monism and holism into coincidence.
When theorizing about an all-inclusive reality, the first and most important principle is containment, which simply tells us what we should and should not be considering. Containment principles, already well known in cosmology, generally take the form of tautologies; e.g., "The physical universe contains all and only that which is physical."............

(part 1)

>>3210009

>porn simulators will become a reality

>>3118295
>mfw you actually mention him
What the flying fuck.
I'm reading Master's Voice now.
Already got 3 more of his books prepared.
I read Peace on Earth, Fiasco, Solaris and Return from the Stars.
I'm gonna read Solaris again because it's orgasmic. In a depressing way.

Where are you from, good sir?

>my face when im actually a hotshot space cadet who fucks a different babe every night

WASSUP STUPID CRACKERS??