[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14598694 [View]
File: 10 KB, 300x390, 1488243431142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14598694

If homogenous time implies energy, homogenous space inertia, isotropic space angular inertia, then what does isotropic time imply?

>> No.14580469 [View]
File: 10 KB, 300x390, 1488243431142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14580469

The field must've evolved since he wrote the books. What are some areas he doesn't touch upon?

>> No.14559507 [View]
File: 10 KB, 300x390, 1488243431142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14559507

Let's read through Landau!

https://libgen.is/search.php?req=Course+of+Theoretical+Physics&column=series

I don’t know what the format of these threads or the pace of the reading is going to be.
For starters, I will now just try to initiate a conversation by reflecting upon the content I read.

Then I’ll open up the exercises to be done.

>Vol 1: Mechanics
This is the first of 10 volumes on Landaus „theoretical minimum“, an introduction to theoretical physics. The first book is on classical mechanics.

The English translation of the book starts with characterization of the man, they jerk him off a little. Not gonna get into history now, though.

>> No.9203970 [View]
File: 9 KB, 300x390, wtf_am_I_reading_landau.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9203970

WHAT

THE

FUCK

>> No.8731589 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 10 KB, 300x390, 1488243431142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8731589

Can you get a gf while studying math and physics?

>> No.8709029 [View]
File: 9 KB, 300x390, wtf_am_I_reading_landau.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8709029

People can be very good at anything if they invest the time. I feel that way about myself and project that it can't be so hard for other to excel.
Some people who are good in their speciality don't impress me. I think it's admirable if they have discipline, though. I think it's cool if they found what they like.
I can't know how other brains work. I know I'm smart and I know there are some guys who I can work with well or who I can ask things about certain topics and they know their stuff.
I'm 31 now, studied physics to a PhD. My first response to that question was
>the guys who solved all problems super fast at uni do some stupid consulting shit now - the raw speed/intelligence doesn't mean much. It's often not used for anything outstanding
On a tangent, and maybe along those lines,
Grothendieck wrote about smart people here

https://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/the-capacity-to-be-alone/

>> No.8262269 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 9 KB, 300x390, wtf_am_I_reading_landau.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8262269

Some coding golf for you.

In the language of your choice, write a function mapping a string s to a string r describing it, as in the following example:
s = "aaaaabbbbccccccaaaaaaa"
r = "5a4b6c7a"

Saw this on a Python community corner of the web, where one concise but arguably obscure solution was

import re
s = 'aaaaabbbbccccccaaaaaaa'
print ''.join(str(len(c)) + c[0] for c in [m.group(0) for m in re.finditer(r"(\w)\1*", s)])

>> No.8183641 [View]
File: 9 KB, 300x390, wtf_am_I_reading_landau.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8183641

>>8183623
Doubt it. The learning curve for this is too steep and it's too far removed from problems people know understand.
Proving stuff like Beaz conjecture and whatnot that only exists because this field (formulation) exists ... nobody cares for that

That's as far as my perspective goes and why I'm interested in "interesting" (for many people) problems. If n-cats help with with approaching stuff like this, that's cool, because algebra is a clean thing.

>> No.6557972 [View]
File: 9 KB, 300x390, wtf_am_I_reading_landau.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6557972

>What's your favorite invariant and why is it relevant?
>Can the correlation functions you work on be used in any subfield of statistical and condensed matter physics?
>What do you think of emergent gravity theories and ad hoc matrix models (i.e. looking at the Lagrangians independent from a stringly motivation)?
>Do you follow algebraic approaches at all, do you follow geometric stuff like Connes work?
>What do you think of people applying gauge theory to financial markets?
>Are you a fan of glueballs?
>Do you even lift particle trajectories in fibres with non-classical Lie groups acting on them?
>Is quantization a functor?
>Do you think we lack some crucial measure theoretic factoids regarding functional integration? Emphasis on lacking mathematics here, not physical insight.
>What main building block of theoretical physics are you really bad at, even if you maybe shouldn't be?
>What is the most messy thing about chemistry?
>What are some bad current approaches to quantum gravity?
>What's your favorite interpretation of QM, or should we all shut up and calculate?
>What are the most overlooked scientists, in your humble opinion?
>Who writes the most beautiful papers?
>What advice do you give to your PhD's?
>How, in your view, is academia different from 20 years ago
then
>In particular, how have the career paths changed?
>Do you think an internet presence helps in getting where you want to go?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]