[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11447151 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11447151

>>11447120
>no psychophysical parallelism

>> No.11283494 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11283494

>>11283457
Another possible alternative is psychophysic parallelism. It could be that consciousness is epiphenomenalism in some sense, but we can only perceive the realities where it appears as if it causally potent, giving the illusion that it is. If the Many-Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is true, it could be that only a tiny fraction of the Everett branches are compatible with qualia existing.

>> No.11276339 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11276339

>>11272393
Consciousness actively interacts with spacetime. Interactionist dualism is the only epistemology of qualia that makes any sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.11256994 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11256994

Interactionist dualism is the only rational metaphysical view of consciousness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10898381 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10898381

>>10895152
Consciousness is unironically the fifth fundamental force in physics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10894171 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10894171

>>10894007
>not being a psychophysic parallelist

>> No.10889869 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10889869

>>10888922
>not knowing the difference between reductive physicalism and interactionist dualism

>> No.10861617 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10861617

>>10860559
No

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10683697 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10683697

>>10682904
>If you believe otherwise then you believe in a ghost in the machine.
Why shouldn't I believe in a ghost in the machine?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10646124 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10646124

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10634845 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634845

>>10632655
Consciousness

>> No.10620485 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10620485

Interactionist dualism still makes more sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10594437 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10594437

>>10594009
>If you do, how do you justify that scientifically?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10586598 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10586598

>>10586386
Consciousness is immaterial, and interactionist dualism is the only philosophy of mind that makes any sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10565455 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10565455

Interactionist dualism is the only philosophy of mind that makes any sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10563864 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10563864

>>10561169
>Who is more correct Chalmers or Dennett?
Both of them are equally retarded. Interactionist dualism is the only philosophy of mind that makes any sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10514546 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10514546

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10510823 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10510823

>>10509218
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10499725 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10499725

Relevant:
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww

>> No.10499573 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10499573

>>10498434
It's not just that it hasn't been done yet, it's that the premise that the neurological processes that create qualia and qualia itself are ontologically the same thing seems to lead to direct contradictions. That's like saying that no one has figured out how to make 2+2=5 yet, but it might be possible. Read this:
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.10493675 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10493675

>>10491773
That, and his arguments in his videos are full of logical fallacies. For instance, not knowing the difference between physicalism and interactionist duaism.

>> No.10479930 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1920x420, types of dualism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10479930

>>10478045
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]