/sci/ - Science & Math

What does /sci/ think of this?

>>15030857
>It depends on the function.
This is canonical hand waving, in the end bits must be arranged from state A to state B, a physical process, whether your brain synapses or breadboard, its all physical

>Math isn't physics.
Indeed, so they should stop selling their snake oil to the physicists as 'real'

>>14771768
only the sufficiently autistic can fathom the chasm between precision at arbitrary iteration and [math]\text{exactness}[/math]

but anyone, if given the means, can hear the difference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NlI4No3s0M&ab_channel=Trippin%27onCookies

what can I say, I do not believe taking a third from ten to be equivalent to four from twelve.

Babylonians seemed to appreciate exactness to a greater degree than we do today, labouring on video related to find all the perfectly rational triangles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L24GzTaOll0&ab_channel=InsightsintoMathematics

>>14746143
>abstract thought

as we see in Wildbergers critique on set theory, is that arithmetic with natural numbers, with comp sci forms the basic of combinatorics, of which set theory forms a part. A general theme is to stop taking variable instantiate for granted. You will never be able to arrange nothingness, coping out saying mathematically speaking is a self-reflexive non sequitor, whats the point of math in the first place if not to model reality?

When arithemtic with natural numbers with com sci informs the nature of the continuum instead of set theory
>>14746172
the difference between zero, nothingness, false and null become first order objects, not language games

>>11827334
Based

>>9821782