/sci/ - Science & Math

>/sci/ doesn't understand what limits are
Not this shit again.

>>9439218
>electric universe theory
>It's petty incredible as an observation based.. actual science.
No.

>>8583477
>Post bullshit in a AGW thread.
>Get laughed at.
>Move to a different AGW thread and try again.
Really?

>>8283898
>>8284905
>Literally takes 2 seconds to Google.
>https://avt.inl.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/fsev/costs.pdf
Uh, that graph clearly shows that electric vehicles kick the ass of petrol vesicles in fuel costs.

>Slope of lines of electric and gas should be compared.
The slope of the lines should definitely NOT be compared, because they use different fucking vertical axes.

Going with the least efficient EVs, at 2mi/kWh, and a moderately efficient car, at 22mpg:

>When gas is 2.60 a gallon, a 22mpg car uses the same energy as an elrctric car being powered for .10/kwh.
Petrol: $2.60/gal / 22mpg = 12c/mi
Electric: 10c/kWh / 2mi/kWh = 5c/mi
12c/mi > 5c/mi

>Right now, gas is about 2.00/gal which means an electric car would need to be supplied with power at about .7/kwh.
Petrol: $2.00/gal / 22mpg = 9c/mi
Electric: 7c/kWh / 2mi/kWh = 3.5c/mi
9c/mi > 3.5c/mi

>Since most cars do better than 22 mpg, [...] Gas would have to be 3.70 before electric broke even, let alone performed better.
And most electric cars do better than 2mi./kWh. But even still:
Petrol: $3.70/gal / 30mpg = 12.3c/mi
Electric: 12.3c/mi * 2mi/kWh = 24.6c/kWh
Which is still nearly double the average US residential rate of 12.8c/kWh.

They gave you a pretty graph in case you were too dumb to do basic division, and you STILL FUCKED UP.
Get off /sci/. Don't come back.

>>8028789
>>8029590
Just stop.
This is pathetic.

Jesus
Fucking
Christ