/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4128597
Please, show me this example of real intelligence.

>>3977118
seconded. Everytime someone starts arguing economic theory, i thank godel for disproving the entire field as a fraud

>>3704011
OP needs to learn that even if you formulate a consistent question, it does not mean you can get a ture answer.

>>3557663

bump for awesometastic
>>>/b/344482617

>>3306803
Solve Global Poverty and the inequities developed by unrestrained capitalism.

>>3247267
Uh, I guess when YOU think about it, it's circular.

But for us with greater rational and linguistic integrity, it's fairly straightforward.

>>3214474
Takes too much work.

>>3178743
>See OP, this is an example of how someone intelligent can delude themselves into thinking that what they see as right and rational on every single subject means every new object of preponderance is immediately discoverable and categorized into preceding information.
>This also means that all objects with any fuzzyness about their existence must be either strictly codified into existing language or entirely thrown out due to the inability of the current paradigm to explain them in a way that some hurr durr won't take his words out of context.

>See OP, some scientists what to be right regardless of reality, such that they try to match the fervor of their support with the fervor of their denialists, essentially making them just as inane, insane and wanton for ignorance.

>>3133643
and your predictions are useless because they interact with the matter you are predicting. They're a strange quantum form of self-fulling prophecy, and everyone except economists arn't clued in.