/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11177282
Red flag thread spotted. Same as 5G threads.

>>10842480
>how will we survive in the future without it?
GMOs only exist for companies to make money. You can tell just be realizing the GMOs are not for better nutrition or better flavor, but instead for disease resistance and pesticide resistance. GMOs are not for consumers, they are for businessmen. Which is why golden rice isn't grown in any significance. It was just a PR vehicle.

>>10406945
>>10406941
This.

This entire thread.

>>10079850
>taste better

Because people don't care about that as much as how it looks. They spend their money on the prettiest. They give the companies money and the companies give them what they want. You are an outlier, someone who wants something different than the mediocre majority.

>>9787541
DEMONIC SCIENCE!!!

>>9792823
You are an filthy, chemical pushing, industrial farmer. Getting mad about that fact just shows everyone how much of a green jude you really are. You are the enemy that's trying to poison our children.

>>9782873
Long term for us: 50 years
Long term for FDA: 2 years study

>>9535117
>technology that's better than 1800s England

Better in what regard and for what use? Do you actually know how biodiversity, farming, and permaculture actually works? Let me give you a hint, it isn't how Monsanto wants you to think it does, kid.

>>9485328

>>9428341

>>9379948
The organic cultivar is a sweeter dent corn. The GMO cultivar is a starchier dent corn. Meaning the animal went after the sweeter corn instead of the starchier corn. The GMO corn is "Yellow Dent #5". If you've ever eaten it yourself, you'd know it tastes fucking nasty due to the high starch content. It was developed specifically for the extra starch. More starch = more products that can be made from it. Regular dent corn is already high in starch, but YD#5 goes overboard. It is no wonder the animal at the other ear first.

t. Homegrowmen that dislikes GMOs in his garden and foods

>>9095571
>playing dumb

>>9035842
Shill thread spotted.

>>8988363
>gmos = selective breeding maymay

>>8940488
>resident monsanto shill post

>this thread again

China & Monsanto sure do like to sow disinformation in the West.

Another thread where people don't understand what the definition of GMO is and think it means any thing that has to do with selective breeding.

>>8883002
>people think GMOs are evil
>GMOs haven't been around for very long term studies (50 year)
>short term study results conflict horribly
>companies use all manner of tactics to vilify anti-GMO ala tobacco company tactics in the 1970s and 1980s.

There's so much shit with GMO that I'll avoid it until it has been properly sorted out and impartially tested. I can live my entire live without eating or using GMO products. Hell, I farm most of my own food already and soon that will be 100%.

>>8883474
Why do you think they will be more responsible if they use golden rice? The same logistical problem exists with golden rice, no one is actually growing it in the first place.

>>8727861

>>8389121
Oh its this thread again.

>>8345137
I think it is being used too early for food production. More rigorous testing is needed to understand long term health effects as well as environmental impact. By long term, I mean 25+ years just for 1 study.

You see this image?

Instead of Monsanto, you can just add in any name for any side of any argument you want and it will be the exact same.

>>8237354
>self-studies funded
>not biased

>>8223932
Tell that to Monsanto.