/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15149431
Thats literally what they did in the original tabacco mosic experiment:
> https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/apsnetfeatures/Documents/2008/Mayer1886.pdf

So what he did, was just grinding up plant matter.
Adding water to it, and injecting it into a vein of a adult plant.
There was no control experiment done.
Nor "a isolation" of the specific "virus".
He ground up crap, mixed it with water, and injected it into a plant.
You can do the same with any plant.
Take leafs, grind them up mix them with water.
Take a syringe and inject it into the plant.

This is not proof of anything but:
> if you inject crap that doen't belong in a vein of a plant
> the plant dies...
> because you fucked up it's pathway of retrieving nutrition and water

The absense of a controll experiment, where he would grind up a healthy plant, mix it with water and inject it aswell into a healthy plant is unscientific.

The invasive methology of a nontraditional pathway of inocculation via directly injecting it into a plant.
Does not prove:
> a virus flying arround
> dropping on the soil
> getting absorbed by the plant
> then the plant gets sick