/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8868040
>lol i trol u
>I was only pretending to be retarded!

>>8630210
>I'd gladly round it to zero though because we both know that's what it is
In other words, you'd like to change the evidence to make it fit your opinions. Care to explain how that's anything other than a fraudulent attempt to prop up your unfalsifiable dogma? :^)

>one of these would tower over by several factors of 10 the entirety of human co2 production
literally a lie.
the gassiest of magmas are maybe 0.1% CO2 by mass, and a supervolcano eruption puts out somewhere upwards of 10^12 tons of ejecta. let's be generous and say that a really really big eruption (on par with the one that created the Fish Canyon Tuff, arguably the largest eruption known) would be ten times that size. That's 10^13 metric tons of ejecta, or (again, a generous estimate) 10^10 tons of CO2, or 10 gigatons of carbon dioxide. Wow! Ten BILLION tons of carbon dioxide spewed into the atmosphere in one massive blast!
Except that human activity emits THREE TIMES THAT MUCH IN A SINGLE YEAR. You claimed that a supervolcano eruption would dwarf the entire cumulative total of anthropogenic carbon dioxide, but it's about what we produce in four months. You made shit up off the top of your head because it sounded about right, and you've just revealed that you really don't know a damn thing about what you're talking about. Go and sit in the corner and think about your miserable existence.
>http://www.d.umn.edu/~mille066/Teaching/2312/Elements%20Articles/Self%20Elements'08%20supervolcanoes.pdf
>https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Calvin_Miller/publication/240779372_Supervolcanoes_and_their_explosive_supereruptions/links/54412bf20cf2e6f0c0f6021d.pdf
>https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/which-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-volcanoes-or-human-activities