[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.10882292 [View]
File: 3 KB, 124x87, wat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10882292

>post yfw 6% yield

>> No.8375204 [View]
File: 3 KB, 124x87, 1429925872991.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8375204

>Are we gonna have toilet on Mars?

>> No.7216892 [View]
File: 2 KB, 124x87, ௵.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7216892

>"you never see galaxies like this"
>points to the milky way

>> No.7123327 [View]
File: 2 KB, 124x87, ௵.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7123327

How does the doppler effect fit in with the particle-side nature of light? One would think that a photon emitted from an electron dropping levels would have the same wavelength (by hv=E) regardless of how it's moving w/r/t the observer. Is it as simple as the source's extra kinetic energy getting added to the photon? If so, then how does that explain doppler shifting when the OBSERVER'S velocity changes w/r/t the source? Once the light's been emitted, its energy shouldn't be changing.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]