/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16097839
>And you can't be trusted to supply them. Oh, sure, you can claim that you have the facts, but how can we know?
Why don't you pick a specific claim about the Holocaust to support. Maybe then we'll be talking about something real, rather than psychoanalysis and insults.

>So you're saying they retro-actively chaged people's perception when those events were still in the public memory?
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Changed who's perception? Which events were "in the public memory" here?

>And not a single one of the liberators thought to question these wild tales?
They received some scrutiny, and still do, but they were useful to allied propaganda so they were repeated ad nauseum by media and government.

You should read some of the claims about the Holocaust made at Nuremberg. There were some real howlers.
The defendants were barred from refuting these "facts". In Germany it is still illegal to defend yourself against charges of Holocaust denial by trying to refute the supposed facts of the Holocaust with evidence.