[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15711956 [View]
File: 122 KB, 2048x1365, FuhjPeiaYAAIfDH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15711956

Hey guys, did you know that in terms of Low-Earth Orbit and Martian surface payload delivery, the SpaceX Starship is the most efficient rocket for its cost? Not only is it fully and rapidly reusable, the holy grail of rocketry, the SpaceX Starship is capable of lifting more than 150 metric tonnes, this means they’re large enough to be able handle the largest satelites, and with its stainless steel construction, you can be rough with one. Due to its massive size, there’s no doubt in my mind that a fully fueled Starship would be incredibly powerful, so powerful that you could easily lose engines without mission failure. They can also lift telescopes, space station modules, other spacecraft, along with not having paint to hide seams, so it’d be incredibly easy for one to get inspected. With their removeable heat shield tiles, they can easily recover from reentry with enough spare tiles. No other rocket comes close to this level of power. Also, fun fact, if you choose the lunar variant, you can make your Starship turn white. Starship is literally built for human exploration. Ungodly thrust+size+fairing volume+engine efficiency means it can take payloads all day, all shapes and sizes and still come for more.

>> No.15403610 [View]
File: 122 KB, 2048x1365, FuhjPeiaYAAIfDH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15403610

>>15402978
yes

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]