/sci/ - Science & Math

>oldspace

>>15310453
>that pfp
did you come here because of krystal?

>>14803488
Yes we remember you from earlier in the thread, no she isn't hot, yes you have low standards

>>14739921
the best shit in the toilet still deserves the flusher

Absolutely disgusting.

>>14636024
gross
delete it

>>12272105
((Government))
Parent authism
Genes?

>>12046750
It isn't, because task-specific artificial intelligence is not artificial general intelligence, by definition. You are nothing more than a cultist.
By the way, I'm not a Luddite, but nor am I delusional!

13 hours and every single janitor thought this was a quality science thread. I'm fucking done.

>>11605164
>not wearing gloves while handling that thing

Nose knows

>dream interpreters in in fucking /sci/

The absolute state of this board...

Really need to download some standards...

Do you know a standard depository were i can dowload them?

>>9851221
>tumblr png file

>>9806124
I'm so sorry.

>>9790391
If your theory can't accomodate simple objects like triangles and circles then there is no reason to use it.

>>9653572
with logarithms you might add an exponent behind the function. where composition of functions is multiplication and the exponent is the number of compositions
[math]\underbrace{f \circ \dots \circ f}_\text{n times} = f^n[/math]

When you do that with the triangle notation, you can not add the exponent to indicate the amount of times you itterate the function because its obviously ambiguous.
The upper part of the triangle is reserved for a different meaning.
[math]\underbrace{_2\triangle \circ \dots \circ_2\triangle} _\text{n times} = _2\triangle^n [/math]

I am at a loss of words to fully describe how disgusting this notation is.
my hate for it burns with the intensity of more than a thousand suns and the inventor should be completely destructed off the face of this earth

>>9644406
>browsing 4chan on your phone

Yeah sage this thread