/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10708269
>your house consumes ~15,000 kWh per year (kw/h- really, dumbass?)
>a 1m^2 panel rated at ~150-200W (roughly a kWh a day) can maybe get 300-400kWh per year
>thus, 40-50 m^2 of panels are needed to break completely even (less if you live in sunnier parts of the world)
You don't need the powerwalls. You can transfer the electricity to the grid. You can also get such a level of paneling for like 10k if you do some DIY stuff- even with your cheapass electricity and including efficiency loss with age, those panels will break even after 13-14 years at most and you'll get free electricity for another ~10 years (at 70-60% efficiency) after that until they degrade completely.
The future is in the fusion-fission-solar trinity, pleb.

>>10154926
>completely different bone structures are the same thing as different hair colors

>>9716182
90
Ignorance is bliss
80
Same, but you're reaching the point where your intelligence is gonna cause actual concrete problems
70
Same but even less bliss, as ignorance caps out at like 90/80 ish

100-110
You'll probably realize you're an idiot, but you can still live a meaningful life and do most of what most people want

120 and up to like 140-150
This is the absolute worst place to be. if your iq is 130, you're intelligent enough to be considered intelligent by most people, as you're probably more intelligent than the wast majority of people you meet. This leads to "intelligence" becoming a part of your identity, which leads to extreme internal confilct when you realize you're not intelligent enough to do a lot of actually intelligent people can.


>also, sorry for replying to this shitty shit thread please sage, i just cant help myself

>>9712854

>>9645737
>>9645736
Do you guys think increasing life-expectancy means literally nothing changes except that you dont die when you're supposed to? The entire point is to accellerate/deccellerate aging, or atleast simulate that effect. The average 70 year old from a population with an average life expectancy of 85 is probably gonna be in better shape than a 65 year old from a population with an average life expectancy of 70.

>>9395159
look at this brainlet